That's great, and works well. But, you can mix it up, too. Sometimes you can differentiate for readiness based on a more "on-the-spot" assessment, or check-for-understanding. This will allow your instruction to be informed right then and there -- you don't have to wait until the next day (or, let's be honest, sometimes it can be a few days to a week before you've had a chance to grade those quizzes and analyze the data).
One way to do this is to give your students a task at the very beginning of class, one that will allow you to quickly assess whether the student "gets it" or not. If you're interested in this, you have got to check out this video!!! (It's only about 3-4 minutes long . . . go ahead -- check it out!)
Here's what I love so much about what this teacher does:
- He quickly circulates as students complete the opening task, simply marking an E or an S on each student's paper. Simple, do-able.
- He uses some great language when getting ready to differentiate. If students have an E on their paper, then they are "ready for the extension." If students have an S, then they are "ready for support" or "ready for a session." Students are not told what they "need," which can sound sort of demeaning to those who "need help." Rather, they're informed about what they're "ready" for. Semantics can be so simple and powerful.
- There's some student self-assessment and choice built in. He marks some students' papers with an E/S, acknowledging that they are a bit "on the fence" with that task, and allows them to decide what they will do -- seek out the extension, or the support. Maybe they'll try out the extension and run with it. Or maybe they'll try it out and decide they'd like more support.
No comments:
Post a Comment