Face Value -- Not All It's Cracked Up To Be

Do you have students who accept everything they read in a newspaper or in a magazine or see on the Internet at face value? I'm willing to bet you do. (I'm even willing to bet you know some adults who are too often guilty of this!) This is a dangerous way, Kelly Gallagher (author of Deeper Reading: Comprehending Challenging Texts and my latest in a long line of academic crushes) warns, "to read your way through life" (2004, p. 84).  And, regardless of content area, we want our students to dig around beneath the surface of the information they're encountering, to think about what's not being said.

A great way to get into this with students, according to Gallagher, is by examining tables, charts, and graphs. Here's a chart Gallagher shares with his students (p. 83):

Influenza-related deaths have increased dramatically since the 1970s.

Influenza Deaths                                       Influenza Deaths

1977                                                           1999

Approximately 18,000                      Approximately 65,000

Gallagher asks students to fill in the left side of a t-chart by listing everything the chart tells them. They might list the following: influenza deaths rose dramatically between 1977 and 1999; in 1977, there were approximately 18,000 deaths; in 1999, there were approximately 65,000 deaths.

Next, it's time to encourage students to dig a little deeper -- what's not being said in the chart? Students use the right side of their t-charts to brainstorm everything this chart may be leaving out, a list that might include: what caused this dramatic rise in influenza deaths?; where were these deaths? in the U.S.? elsewhere?; who is the source of this information?

Finally, Gallagher asks his students to think about this question: What might have caused such a dramatic rise in flu-related deaths? He records their inferences on the board (such inferences might include: there were more strains of the flu in 1999 than in 1977; people in 1999 had worse medical care than in 1977; flu vaccines stopped working; there were more people in 1999 than in 1977). Gallagher is "train[ing his] students not only to notice what is said, but also to infer what is left unsaid . . . [He] want[s] them to realize that every time something is said, something remains unsaid, and that every time something is written, something remains unwritten" (p. 84).

Bonus: I think this would make a wonderful pre-reading activity if students are about to read a piece of text that includes charts, graphs, and/or tables. Doing this exercise with a graph that's about to appear in the reading students will later do can provide students with an interesting purpose to read -- perhaps they will learn more through reading the entire text, and, if they don't, what will this tell them about this particular source? Students could even be encouraged to conduct further research (a lovely extension activity!).